Bombay High Court: Courts Must Provide Reasoned Orders Under Section 34; ‘Limited Scope’ Not a Substitute for Addressing Specific Challenges in NAFED-REPL Arbitration Case

Dark Mode

CESTAT Chennai: Staff Reimbursements, Training, and Joint Venture Hospital Management Not Taxable as Service Under Finance Act

TRIBUNALS AND FORUMS

CESTAT Chennai: Staff Reimbursements, Training, and Joint Venture Hospital Management Not Taxable as Service Under Finance Act

Pranav B Prem

CESTAT Kolkata Rules No Service Tax On Joint Venture Income; Sets Aside ₹5.72 Crore Demand Against Rahee Infratech

TRIBUNALS AND FORUMS

CESTAT Kolkata Rules No Service Tax On Joint Venture Income; Sets Aside ₹5.72 Crore Demand Against Rahee Infratech

Sangeetha Prathap

Bid By Two Legal Entities Held To Be Joint Venture | Interpretation Of Tender Terms Upheld | Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge To Disqualification Under Clause 2.4

HIGH COURTS

Bid By Two Legal Entities Held To Be Joint Venture | Interpretation Of Tender Terms Upheld | Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge To Disqualification Under Clause 2.4

Isabella Mariam In a recent...

HIGH COURTS

"Petitioner Estopped by Prior Declaration": Bombay High Court Upholds MAHAGENCO's Rejection of Bid and EMD Forfeiture Citing Clause IV Compliance and Misrepresentation

Isabella Mariam The Division...

Bombay High Court: Courts Must Provide Reasoned Orders Under Section 34; ‘Limited Scope’ Not a Substitute for Addressing Specific Challenges in NAFED-REPL Arbitration Case

HIGH COURTS

Bombay High Court: Courts Must Provide Reasoned Orders Under Section 34; ‘Limited Scope’ Not a Substitute for Addressing Specific Challenges in NAFED-REPL Arbitration Case

Kiran Raj The Division Bench...